3

I installed XAMPP and Joomla! and everything works fine. Now I decided that it would be reasonable to have two local Joomla! websites to have more practice. How can I do that? It's pretty strange that there isn't much info on that. Where can I read about the way of creating one more Joomla! website using XAMPP?

4

It's relatively easy- you follow the same process as you do for installing a normal Joomla installation, but use a different subdirectory for each subsequent Joomla installation.

Example (updated)

  • localhost/site1/
  • localhost/site2/

It's also a good idea to use a different database for each one, but I guess you don't have to provided the database prefix is different for each site you create.

  • 1
    Typically this would mean that you either access the site at localhost/site1 or that you set up hostnames locally for the different sites, which gets a bit more complicated. – David Fritsch Jul 15 '15 at 2:41
2

Personally I don't like using localhost/site1 and localhost/site1.

I prefer using a Virtual Host so everything is completely separated. The result would mean using domains such as:

site1.loc
site2.loc

Similar to:

site1.com
site2.com

It's a little bit of work to get set up, however the end result is far better.

We've compiled a few answer for different platforms which you can see below:

Virtual host for Joomla

There is no answer specifically for Xampp, but one for Wampserver which I also prefer as it's more flexible in my opinion.

Update:

Why is using a Virtual Host better?

  • It results in a cleaner URL structure
  • Setting up permissions for each individual domain is possible
  • Dealing with base URL's can sometimes with an issue with some applications or CMS's without a Virtual Host
  • You can use different ports for each Virtual Host (advanced usage)

There are probably some more technical advantages but that's something a server administrator would be able to shed more light on

Hope this helps

  • +1 For the great link, but can you elaborate more on why you think this method is better? – TryHarder Jul 15 '15 at 11:40
  • Cheers for that :) – TryHarder Jul 15 '15 at 12:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.